In New Mexico’s sprawling northeast corner, residents have only one health care option, for everything from medical emergencies to annual physical exams: Union County General Hospital (UCGH), a full-service facility in Clayton, the tiny county seat. In just over a month, it might be forced to close its doors for good.

UCGH faces many of the same pressures that are straining rural hospitals throughout New Mexico and across the country. Declining populations and low reimbursement rates for Medicaid and Medicare patients, who are over-represented in small towns, have made it difficult to cover costs. A nationwide shortage of doctors has hit rural hospitals especially hard, as more and more physicians opt to move to urban centers.

New Mexico has lost physicians at an unparalleled rate over the past five years, a change that experts attribute at least partially to malpractice exposure. According to a study by the Physicians Advocacy Institute, a nonprofit research and policy group, the state lost a total of 248 practicing physicians between 2019 and 2024 — the only state in the country to experience a net loss of doctors during that span of time.

But in New Mexico, a unique problem has pushed many hospitals in far-flung areas into crisis mode: The state has become so lucrative for medical malpractice lawsuits that most insurers have fled. The few that remain now charge such exorbitant rates that small hospitals are desperately struggling to pay the premiums — if they can even find an insurer to cover them.

“I’ve looked for insurers in London, in the Bahamas, all over the world,” says Tammie Chavez, Chief Executive Officer at UCGH. During her search in 2023, one after another turned her down, saying they wouldn’t do business in New Mexico. “My policy was going to expire at midnight on December 31, and I thought we were going to be closing the doors on January 1.”

Downtown Clayton. Nadav Soroker/Searchlight New Mexico

After scouring the globe and being rejected by more than 40 insurers, Chavez was able to find two companies willing to cover the hospital at the eleventh hour. The price tag for the cheaper of two available policies: $850,000 a year, which is nearly 500 percent higher than the $142,565 premium the hospital had paid previously. On top of that, she would have to put up a $100,000 certificate of deposit and close down the hospital’s bariatric program, which the company would not insure. She signed the papers, keeping the hospital’s lights on for another year.

Now, once again, Chavez needs to find another plan when the hospital’s current coverage expires at the end of this year. If insurers hike their prices yet again, the cost of coverage will likely close the hospital, the county’s only health care clinic, and a school-based health center — all of which are staffed by UCGH.

“There is not another hospital in New Mexico close to me for 84 miles,” Chavez says, referring to the nearest medical center, which is in Raton. For patients needing specialty care for certain conditions, the closest facility is in Amarillo, Texas, a two-hour drive away.

“Heart attacks will not make it to the next town if we’re not here,” Chavez says. “Stroke victims won’t make it. Trauma victims won’t make it. I don’t know how to put it any more bluntly: Without this hospital, people will die.”

Residents of Union County aren’t alone. Across the state, hospitals both large and small are grappling with an exodus of insurers and a corresponding explosion in coverage costs. But the problem is particularly acute in rural hospitals, which typically have much smaller budgets and thinner margins than their urban counterparts.

The Union County General Hospital stands at the north end of Clayton, a town on the eastern plains of New Mexico. Nadav Soroker/Searchlight New Mexico

Rural populations also tend to be older, with more complex health needs. Lower-income patients covered by New Mexico Medicaid plans often can’t get coverage in Texas hospitals, which are shorter distances away for many residents of eastern New Mexico. Such patients are forced to drive for hours to get care in Santa Fe or Albuquerque — or, if they can’t make the trip, to forgo care entirely.

There are non-medical risks, too: In New Mexico’s northeast, UCHG is the county’s largest employer and the linchpin of the region’s economy, which is otherwise dominated by ranching and farming. According to Union County Commission Chair Clay Kiesling, its closure would be “catastrophic” in terms of job losses.

“We’d be looking at a cascading kind of event,” Kiesling says. “We have an aging population here that needs health care, and without it people might leave. We’d have a drop in population. We’d lose the largest employer in this area. I mean, it would be really bad.”

Union County Commission Chair Clay Kiesling. Nadav Soroker/Searchlight New Mexico

Malpractice gold rush

Higher-than-average malpractice insurance premiums in New Mexico are not entirely new. A 2020 report from the state Office of the Superintendent of Insurance showed that while premiums in the state were only slightly higher than average for internal medicine, they were substantially higher than most other states for general surgery and obstetrics and gynecology.

But those costs surged even higher after the legislature’s 2021 regular session, with passage of a bill that dramatically raised the caps on malpractice liability from $600,000 to $6 million over a five-year period — among the highest in the country. That figure can be applied to different defendants in a single case, so, for example, if a suit is brought over a surgery that involved an obstetrician, an anesthesiologist, and a hematologist, a plaintiff can ask for $18 million — a figure that doesn’t include punitive damages, which can drive the payout much higher.

New Mexico’s high caps on liability are only part of the equation, says Fred Nathan, Executive Director of Think New Mexico, a Santa Fe-based nonprofit that focuses on public policy. 

“The state doesn’t cap attorney’s fees or punitive damages, and it allows lawyers to file multiple lawsuits over a single incident of alleged malpractice,” Nathan says. Plaintiffs in a successful suit can get paid in one lump sum, and because there are no caps on attorney’s fees, lawyers can keep as much of that money as they can negotiate with clients. “These sorts of factors have resulted in some extremely large verdicts against hospitals,” Nathan adds. 

Several recent cases illustrate the financial stakes. In May 2023, a jury awarded a patient nearly $23 million after a botched prostate surgery that caused complications requiring at least 17 follow-up operations. A year later, a suit filed in response to a problematic hernia operation at Rehoboth McKinley Medical Center in Gallup resulted in a $68 million judgment, an amount that pushed the hospital to the brink of bankruptcy. And last month, jurors in Albuquerque awarded a patient more than $412 million for unnecessary erectile dysfunction shots administered by a clinic called NuMale Medical Center, setting a national record for these payouts.

NuMale Medical Center in Albuquerque. Nadav Soroker/Searchlight New Mexico

New Mexico has the second-highest rate of malpractice suits per capita in the country, behind only Pennsylvania, according to data from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The vast majority of those cases — about 80 percent — were filed by out-of-state firms, says Troy Clark, President and CEO of the New Mexico Hospital Association. “They hire a New Mexico attorney and get a New Mexico license, but all their operations are outside,” says Clark, with most of the lawyers who file suits in New Mexico coming from firms based in Texas, Missouri and Illinois. 

“We are an attraction for law firms to come in and do business in New Mexico,” he says.

Searchlight could not independently verify the numbers of malpractice cases filed by out-of-state firms, because most law offices are registered as local businesses with the New Mexico Secretary of State.

Still, it’s clear that the number of cases is substantial: During a two-year period beginning in July 2022, New Mexico courts received applications to file 233 malpractice suits, according to data compiled by the New Mexico Medical Review Board, a state commission that analyzes malpractice cases.

This flood of litigation has meant that malpractice insurance companies have consistently lost money in New Mexico. For every $100 insurers receive in premiums in this state, they pay more than $183 in claims, according to a report by Think New Mexico — by far the highest “loss ratio” in the country, and more than double the national average.

“I do believe that if a hospital makes a mistake, then the patient should get restitution,” says Kaye Green, CEO of Roosevelt General Hospital in Portales. “But when the same mistake results in a $250,000 settlement in Texas and millions here, something is wrong. We have a situation now that’s really harming health care in New Mexico, and it’s especially harming small rural hospitals.”

“The patients go to Texas, and the lawyers come to New Mexico”

One particularly troublesome consequence, Green says, is the effect that New Mexico’s malpractice landscape has on providers who are trying to hire new doctors, or to replace ones who move away or retire.

“It’s already hard to recruit physicians to rural hospitals,” she says. “It’s almost impossible. And now, when I interview physicians from other states that I’m trying to recruit, even those that are right out of residency are telling me they cannot come to New Mexico because of the medical malpractice situation. It’s just crazy.”

“We desperately need a cardiologist, another general surgeon, another couple of primary care physicians, and they just won’t come,” Green adds. With physicians, and especially specialists, in short supply, many patients in the area end up traveling to Lubbock for medical care. “The patients go to Texas, and the lawyers come to New Mexico,” she says.

New Mexico has lost physicians at an unparalleled rate over the past five years, a change that experts attribute at least partially to malpractice exposure. According to a study by the Physicians Advocacy Institute, a nonprofit research and policy group, the state lost a total of 248 practicing physicians between 2019 and 2024 — the only state in the country to experience a net loss of doctors during that span of time.

The shortage has stressed hospital systems across New Mexico, sometimes in unexpected ways. One prominent example occurred this year at Santa Fe’s largest hospital, Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center. In April, administrators there outsourced its labor and delivery unit to a venture capital-backed staffing firm called OB Hospitalist Group, a company that brings in doctors from a wide geographic area to work temporary shifts.

Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center in Santa Fe. The hospital experienced a large employee turnover in 2024. Nadav Soroker/Searchlight New Mexico

One of that group’s first orders of business was to slash midwife salaries by 30 percent, according to employees who spoke to Searchlight. Many midwives and obstetricians left as a result, scrambling patients’ birth plans and leaving a substantial gap in services. This fall, staffing problems had become so severe that the hospital had no OB-GYN on-site for a 24-hour period — a problem the hospital attributed to staffing “hiccups,” the Santa Fe New Mexican reported.

In explaining the outsourcing decision to the New Mexican, Christus Chief Operating Officer Hope Wade cited the state’s difficult “malpractice scenarios.”

Christus did not respond to Searchlight’s requests for comment.

A slew of factors are driving the staffing crisis in the state’s health care system. New Mexico charges gross receipts taxes on medical services, which reduces the income doctors can make and reduces the revenue of hospitals and clinics. Over a third of the state’s population is covered by Medicaid, and a further 20 percent are covered by Medicare — both of which often reimburse at a lower rate than the cost of care, forcing health care providers to operate at a loss for many patients. And New Mexico does not offer the tax incentives for medical practitioners that many other states provide. Problems with the state’s education system, crime and other social ills that disproportionately affect New Mexico are further disincentives, hospital administrators say.

“The whole country needs more doctors right now,” says Annie Jung, Executive Director of the New Mexico Medical Society, an organization that advocates for physicians. “And we have barriers that other states don’t have. We’re competing with those other states for doctors.” And, she adds, we’re not competing well.

Annie Jung, Executive Director of the New Mexico Medical Society, in her office in Albuquerque. Nadav Soroker/Searchlight New Mexico

The state government’s record on the issue is mixed: While many analysts and hospital administrators believe the legislature’s decision to drastically increase caps on damages was a catalyst for today’s runaway insurance costs, some lawmakers have taken steps to keep hospitals afloat, at least in the short term.

During New Mexico’s 2024 legislative session, lawmakers changed the state’s formula for Medicaid reimbursement, which resulted in more money flowing to smaller hospitals. And to offset the rising costs of insurance, Sen. George Muñoz (D-Gallup) and Sen. Pat Woods (R-Broadview) successfully introduced a bill to give two years of subsidies to a dozen rural hospitals, including UCGH. Currently, those bills are “the only thing keeping us going,” Tammie Chavez says.

Some think those measures don’t go far enough.

“There are many additional steps that the state should take,” says Fred Nathan. His organization recently published a report on medical malpractice and its consequences in New Mexico. It recommends specific reforms to the state’s malpractice law that Nathan believes would “make patients whole and provide reasonable compensation for their attorneys without excessively burdening doctors and hospitals.” Proposed reforms include capping attorney’s fees, ending lump sum payouts, and tightening caps on punitive damages.

Tammie Chavez, the CEO of UCGH, in one of the hospital’s inpatient rooms. Nadav Soroker/Searchlight New Mexico

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Ed Williams, a Searchlight investigative reporter, covers child welfare, social justice and other issues. In 2022, he was selected for ProPublica’s Local Reporting Network to produce stories about abuses in the foster care system and the devastating impacts on children. Before joining Searchlight, Ed was a reporter in both the United States and Latin America, working for print, digital and radio outlets, including seven years in public radio. His numerous journalism awards include a 2022 First Amendment award and 2019 local accountability reporting award from the News Leaders Association. He has a master’s degree in journalism from the University of Texas at Austin.

Text Ed securely using Signal encryption at (505) 699-6401.

Join the Conversation

20 Comments

  1. The problem with malpractice is malpractice itself, not compensating victims of malpractice who ought to be made whole again in so far as possible.

    Over a 30 year study period it was found that only about 1.8 percent of physicians were responsible for half of all the dollars paid out for malpractice claims, and most of these physicians had multiple payments in their records. But only about 10% of these physicians had ever had any action taken against their licenses by a state licensing board. Even fewer had ever had any action taken against their clinical privileges to practice at a hospital. Maybe if the licenses of the few physicians with the worst malpractice records were restricted until they were retrained or maybe if their licenses were revoked, the amount of malpractice and the number of harmed patients would go down. Malpractice payments would also go down.

    The solution to the problem isn’t to make it harder for injured patients to be fully compensated; the solution is to reduce the number of injured patients.

    By the way, according to a recent report from Public Citizen, the New Mexico medical board ranked 34th in the country in terms of serious licensure actions per thousand licensees. There is no evidence that physicians in any one state are better or worse than physicians in any other state, so the issue is the willingness of the New Mexico medical board to take action against incompetent or misbehaving physicians. The New Mexico board would have had to take about 3 times more actions than it actually took in 2021-2023 to match the best state licensing board.

  2. I moved to Santa Fe in 2019 and have been wondering ever since why there’s such a shortage, and such a high turnover rate, of doctors here. I’ve heard many ideas and rumors, but this article is the most comprehensive coverage I’ve yet seen on the problem. Good investigative reporting is also in short supply (and not just here), but this article goes a long way to restore my belief that thoughtful, in-depth, local reporting is still possible. Thank you.

  3. The basic problem is legislative domination by tort lawyers. I served on a school board and we had an EEOC lawsuit against us: the details don’t matter, but the teachers’ union didn’t back her and all lawsuit attempts failed in NM courts before the Denver feds decided one of the eleven charges might have some merit. Of course, then our lawyers sought to settle out of court, explaining to school board members that the chances of going to trial were outweighed by probable consequences. It would cost the school district a fortune in lawyer’s fees to continue, and, even if the jury felt a little sorry for the plaintiff (who did not have a very good case) and awarded her any money (say $5K) all the lawyer’s fees on both sides would have to be paid. Better to offer her some money and pay the legal fees now. We basically paid the plaintiff $30K back pay (she had been suspended for failing to submit required paperwork for disabled students), reinstated her, then paid her lawyers several hundred thousand dollars.

  4. I feel embarrassed for Searchlight.

    I cannot believe that you would publish an article like this without talking to a single victim of malpractice or to the survivors of someone killed by malpractice.

    You have repeated the one-sided propaganda spoon fed to you by the Hospital Association, which is dominated by private-equity-owned hospitals and billion dollar “health care” corporations. You also ignore a recent LFC report that refutes the main thrust of your piece.

    Searchlight, be better.

    1. Excellent commentary, David Jaramillo and Brian Egolf. It’s not as if either of you have a conflict of interest as malpractice attorneys yourselves, right? Malpractice is devastating and patients experiencing it deserve to be made whole. Thankfully, there are reforms that would allow this to happen while also ensuring more of that compensation goes to their actual care and expenses, rather than lining your pockets. These reforms could even make it so that you are fairly compensated for taking on these cases. Unfortunately, I doubt the tort lawyers running our state legislature will ever allow that to happen.

      I’m most disappointed by your response, former state representative Egolf. It’s clear that you don’t care about fixing the problems with our state’s healthcare system. Of course the New Mexico medical system is becoming ever increasingly dominated by private equity — who else can afford to cover those malpractice insurance premiums? PE obviously can for the few years needed to bleed a particular facility dry until it closes. This means that everyone gets shuttled down to Albuquerque (or Santa Fe, to a lesser extent) because they have no access to care. This has massively overloaded places like UNM and precipitously degraded the quality of care that can be provided. The majority of HCW at UNM are there because they care deeply about the patient population they serve, but it is no longer worth the horrible burnout that comes with it. I’ll be forever grateful for the training I received as a born-and-raised NM healthcare provider, but refuse to sacrifice myself for the system you’ve helped create.

  5. Is this journalism? Not a word about or from the people who lose lives or have lives destroyed by malpractice and corporate greed? Nothing about the billion dollar out of state corporations of insurance companies masquerading as hospitals. How about capping their profits? How about capping hospital defense firm fees? How about some journalism?

  6. Malpractice cases should not be decided by a jury, but by a panel of three judges. Malpractice awards, when warranted, should be indexed to statewide standards, much like criminal law sentences.

Leave a comment

Share a comment with us